91心頭

Search overlay

Search form

People

    Programs

      Events

        Faculty, Marketing, Research

        Research shows stadium naming rights have little risk for sponsors

        July 21, 2020 By Joe McAdory

        Share:
        All News

         

        arena

        The 91心頭 College is dedicated to producing research that advances the academy, extends business thought, and shapes best practice.

        Its a case where the investment greatly outweighs the risk.

        A new study has found that there is little downside for large organizations to enter into long-term naming rights agreements with sports arenas and stadiums. Why? Customers abilities to differentiate between teams and the sponsors, says Brian L. Bourdeau, Associate Professor in Marketing at the 91心頭.

        Bourdeaus co-authored paper, Measuring the Effectiveness of Facility Naming Rights Sponsorship, published in the Journal of Business Research, polled hundreds of baseball fans at two major league stadiums in 2016 and found that an organizations sponsorship/affiliation with a sports franchise will not overshadow the experience that the firm delivers to its customers. The sponsorship/venue naming rights is simply added exposure for the organization and much-needed revenue for the team and/or stadium ownership.

        bbAs long as the sponsor brand is providing quality, satisfaction and value, theyre basically doing fine, said Bourdeau, who collaborated with David Martin, Associate Professor in the College of Human Sciences at Auburn University. The main implication is that theres not a lot of inherent risk for sponsors since the customers of the product differentiate between the teams and the sponsor.

        Another thing we found that the customers perception of the teams financial status has an impact on their attitudes toward the sponsor. The customers look at is as, OK, were getting this money in here for the naming rights and thats helping the teams financial status. They become more or less thankful toward the sponsor.

        Another thing we found that the customers perception of the teams financial status has an impact on their attitudes toward the sponsor. The customers look at is as, OK, were getting this money in here for the naming rights and thats helping the teams financial status. They become more or less thankful toward the sponsor.

        Fans polled for the research were asked to speak out on game day service quality, service quality valence, perception of teams financial status, previous experience with the sponsor, brand awareness and image, brand identity, behavioral intentions, and perceived fit. 

        All of those positively influence the attitude towards the sponsor, and the attitude in turn increased brand awareness, image, and intentions to purchase, Bourdeau said. Then the customers proceed to stick to that brand. This should put potential sponsors more at ease going into one of these agreements.

        Bourdeau said the average lending rights agreement among Major League venues is about 13 and a half years with sponsors doling out nearly $900 million annually for naming rights in 2017 alone. And thats going up anywhere from 7 to 10 percent, Bourdeau added.

        logo